Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Jake Barfield's avatar

Hey Wolf,

As you know I appreciate your thoughts and analysis. So apologies in advance for the somewhat critical tilt of this question which is this; How is this company different from some of the other popular software companies from a few years ago that have been absolutely murdered on a total return basis? Specifically, I'm thinking of Confluent, Elastic, Gitlab and a few others. that were darlings of the SaaS world that have continued to grow top-lines at a fast rate, but which have failed to perform on the open market.

I'm comparing Confluent specifically to Rubrik now. They both operate at a similar scale (~$1 billion LTM revenues) with similar 75% gross margins, are similarly losing about ($400-500 million per year in GAAP OP, with about 25% of sales in SBC, meaning that they are FCF profitable but with significant ongoing dilution. From a qualitative perspective, both are selling mission-critical software with a similar land-and-expand operating model increasingly to enterprise clients with a large proportion of revenues coming from clients with >100k in ARR and with similarly large DNBRs. TAM is similar too with CFLT estimating it at $50 billion as well. Lastly, they both operate in industries with seemingly long-term tailwinds in place (data mobility, and security).

The only difference I see here is that Rubrik is growing at a faster pace (+20% y/y in MRQ for CFLT vs. +50% y/y for RBRK) but that also appears to be accounted for in the valuation discrepancies (CFLT trades at 4.1x NTM Sales vs. 12.9x for RBRK). Is the thought here that RBRK's superior growth rate translates into operating leverage at a higher pace? Enough to offset the significant dilution and the potential for multiple compression?

Expand full comment
amul's avatar

Sprry if i missed it but Could you please explain why it may/can beat its competitors? What advantages they have compared to its competitors in this space? What does this have that commvalult or cohesive doesn't?

Expand full comment
10 more comments...

No posts